What transformations do municipal administrations implement to enact a resilience policy? This article responds to this question from a comparative perspective by analyzing enabling and impeding mechanisms developed in the cities of Montreal (Canada) and London (UK) as they establish their strategies. Collaborative network governance and institutional work mechanisms used in Montreal and London are analyzed in connection with the influence of macro‐ and micro‐contextual elements under which a network can resiliently manage risk and crises. In both cases, the development of resilience emerges from their emergency management structures, as units in charge try to animate their new area of responsibility through collaborative governance. As a siloed approach this is embedded in daily routines, organizations with limited resources focused on shared motivation and values, collaboration across organizational boundaries and creation of joint capacity to implement resilience. This transformative process concerns the organization in charge of resilience in the municipal administration and the wider network that they build and animate.

中文翻译：

---

从政策挑战到实施策略：城市弹性网络治理的赋能策略

市政当局会实施哪些变革以制定弹性政策？本文通过比较蒙特利尔（加拿大）和伦敦（英国）两个城市在制定战略时所建立的推动和阻碍机制，从比较的角度回答了这个问题。分析了在蒙特利尔和伦敦使用的协作网络治理和机构工作机制，并结合了宏观和微观环境因素的影响，网络可以在这些因素的影响下灵活地管理风险和危机。在这两种情况下，抵御能力的发展都源于其应急管理架构，因为主管部门试图通过协作治理来赋予其新的责任领域新的活力。作为一种孤立的方法，它已嵌入到日常工作中，资源有限的组织专注于共同的动机和价值观，跨组织边界的协作以及建立实施抵御能力的联合能力。这一变革过程涉及负责市政管理抵御能力的组织以及他们建立和创建的更广泛的网络。