According to philosophical orthodoxy, intuitions are perception窶人ike in that they provide us with non窶進nferential justification. In this paper, I present four arguments to show that orthodoxy is mistaken: Intuitions, as used in thought experiments, are inferential judgments, that is the results of inferential transitions that are inferentially justified (if justified at all). The discussion will shed light on the nature of intuition but also on the nature of inference.

中文翻译：

---

直觉作为推理判断*

根据哲学上的正统观念，直觉是感知人，因为直觉为我们提供了非进阶的推论理由。在本文中，我提出四个论据来证明正统是错误的：在思想实验中使用的直觉是推论性判断，也就是说，推论性转换的结果是推论性证明是合理的（如果有理由的话）。讨论将阐明直觉的本质，也将揭示推理的本质。