当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Theor. Soc. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Perceptions of counterarguing and source derogation as attitude resistance techniques
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology ( IF 2.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-19 , DOI: 10.1002/jts5.74
Geoffrey D. Munro 1 , Joseph A. Lesko 1 , Zakary Clements 2 , Antonia Santoro 3 , Jeffrey Tsai 1
Affiliation  

People often remotely observe when others resist and reject persuasive messages. Two studies examined participants' perceptions of two strategies, counterarguing and source derogation that people commonly use when resisting persuasive attempts. Additionally, the target resisted a message with which the participants either agreed or disagreed (Studies 1 and 2) and one which contained either strong or weak logic (Study 2). In both studies the strategy of source derogation was evaluated more negatively than counterarguing. Additionally, participants evaluated the target more negatively when he resisted a message with which the participants agreed, even when the target resisted using counterarguing or strong logic. The implications of these different perceptions of attitude resistance techniques is discussed.

中文翻译:

将抗辩和来源克减视为态度抵抗技术

人们经常远程观察别人何时拒绝和拒绝说服力的信息。两项研究检查了参与者对两种策略的看法,即反抗和信奉克减,这是人们通常在抵制说服性尝试时使用的。此外,目标拒绝了参与者同意或不同意的消息(研究1和2),以及包含强或弱逻辑的消息(研究2)。在这两项研究中,对源头减损的策略都进行了较否定性的否定评估。此外,即使目标拒绝使用反议或强硬的逻辑,参与者在拒绝参与者同意的消息时也会更加否定目标。讨论了对姿态抵抗技术的这些不同认识的含义。
更新日期:2020-09-19
down
wechat
bug