Turkey's eight years between 2008 and 2016 has been dominated by Ahmet Davutoğlu's vision of foreign policy, which was derived from his multi‐edition book Strategic Depth (2000). In order to be able to present itself in its larger periphery as a pro‐active, trustworthy actor, Davutoğlu argued, Turkey needed to change the foreign‐policy paradigms with which it was stranded. As the Strategic Depth vision unfolded, it drew explicit parallels between modern Turkey and the Ottoman neighborhood policy. Turkey‐Syria relations since 2008 had been providing the seekers of neo‐Ottomanist tendencies in the contemporary Turkish foreign policy with abundant examples, because Syria, once an Ottoman territory and always a challenge to modern Turkey, came to be the first poster country in the shift towards Turkey's imperial awakening. In the post‐Davutoğlu era, however, the rhetoric and practices of the past eight years seemed suddenly to disappear from the use of the Turkish agents of foreign policy; the new code of terms and actions to replace the Strategic Depth version is yet to be decided. This study seeks to pin down the neo‐imperialist character of Turkey's foreign‐policy discourse of the aforementioned eight years and contribute to discussions of the Turkish aspiration of neo‐Ottomanism with focus on the Syrian crisis through the Justice and Development Party's re‐invented peace discourse. In doing so, it aims to find out and elaborate on the current tendencies of Turkish foreign policy, which are no longer as explicit and articulated as they were during Davutoğlu's ministry and prime ministry. As Turkey's cross‐border operation to Syria — the Euphrates Shield — ends and another one in Idlib begins, a discursive analysis stretching from Davutoglu's diplomatic “zero problems” with Damascus to the military use of ground troops and air force is timely. Such an endeavor would be essential in understanding the spectacular swing from one edge to the other in Turkey's inclination over a phantasmagorical empire.

中文翻译：

---

Pax Ottomanica没有了！后达武托鲁时代和土耳其长期危机中土耳其外交政策中的“和平”话语

土耳其在2008年至2016年的八年间，以艾哈迈德·达武托卢（AhmetDavutoğlu）的外交政策愿景为主导，该愿景源于他的多本著作《战略深度》（Strategic Depth）（2000）。Davutoğlu认为，为了能够在更大范围内表现出自己是一个积极主动，值得信赖的演员，土耳其需要改变陷入困境的外交政策范式。随着战略深度愿景的发展，它在现代土耳其和奥斯曼帝国邻里政策之间形成了明显的相似之处。自2008年以来，土耳其与叙利亚之间的关系一直为当代土耳其外交政策中的新奥斯曼主义倾向的追求者提供了丰富的例子，因为叙利亚曾经是奥斯曼帝国的领土，并且一直是现代土耳其的挑战，因此成为了该国的第一个发布国。转向土耳其的帝国觉醒。然而，在后达沃托卢日时代，过去八年的言论和做法似乎突然因使用土耳其外交政策代理人而消失了。尚未确定取代战略深度版本的新的条款和行为准则。这项研究旨在遏制土耳其在上述八年中的外交政策话语的新帝国主义特征，并通过正义与发展党重新发明的和平，致力于讨论土耳其对新奥斯曼主义的诉求，并着重于叙利亚危机。话语。这样做的目的是找出并详细说明土耳其外交政策的当前趋势，这种趋势已不再像达武托卢卢（Davutoğlu）内阁和总理内阁期间的那样清晰明了。随着土耳其对叙利亚的跨境行动-幼发拉底盾（Euphrate Shield）结束，伊德利卜（Idlib）的另一次行动开始，从达武古托（Davutoglu）展开的话语分析 大马士革的外交“零问题”对地面部队和空军的军事使用是及时的。这样的努力对于理解土耳其从一个边缘到另一个边缘的壮观摆动至关重要。幻幻帝国。