This article examines the serious shortcomings of the procedure of dissolution of the Lebanese Parliament under the First Republic and its paralysis during the Second Republic due to the influence of confessional mechanisms. A close examination of the Lebanese legal system makes it possible to distinguish two sets of disparate constitutional norms. On the one hand, there is the enshrinement of traditional constitutional principles under the purview of parliamentarianism. On the other hand, there is the adoption of a confessional regime of representation and power‐sharing. The two sets of divergent legal norms coexist and co‐function at the intersection of secular democratic principles and the multi‐confessional composition of the Lebanese society. Notable in this regard is the power of dissolution of the Parliament which was amended in 1990 to be consistent with the Lebanese confessional formula in a way that renders it entirely ineffective.

中文翻译：

---

黎巴嫩议会解散：议会制度的错误运用

本文探讨了由于Republic悔机制的影响，在第一共和国统治下的黎巴嫩议会解散程序及其在第二共和国统治期间的瘫痪的严重缺陷。对黎巴嫩法律制度的仔细检查可以区分两组不同的宪法规范。一方面，在议会主义的职权范围内，传统宪法原则得到了体现。另一方面，采用了悔的代表制和权力共享制度。在世俗民主原则与黎巴嫩社会的多重信仰组成部分的交汇处，两组不同的法律规范共存并共存。