Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Promoting Quality of Mixed Methods Consultation Research: A Synergistic Participatory Framework
Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-25 , DOI: 10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743
Bonnie K. Nastasi 1 , John H. Hitchcock 2 , Raquel Gutierrez 1 , Stephanie Oshrin 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with a framework for promoting high quality mixed methods school-based consultation research. Furthermore, this article is intended for researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating their practice. To meet these objectives, we address quality criteria for quantitative (validity) and qualitative (trustworthiness). From there, we review also multiple schemes for quality (legitimation) criteria in mixed methods and propose a synergistic participatory approach that includes legitimation criteria for the integration of qualitative and quantitative work throughout the research process, from conceptualization to dissemination. Our view of integration also applies to the application of findings, which is an idea aligned with participatory processes inherent in our approach to consultation practice. Finally, we discuss and illustrate the application of legitimation criteria to consultation research and evaluation.



中文翻译:

提高混合方法咨询研究的质量:协同参与框架

摘要

本文的目的是为研究人员提供一个促进高质量混合方法校本咨询研究的框架。此外,本文适用于有兴趣评估其实践的研究人员和从业者。为了实现这些目标,我们制定了定量(有效性)和定性(可信度)的质量标准。从那里,我们还审查了混合方法中质量(合法性)标准的多种方案,并提出了一种协同参与的方法这包括在从概念化到传播的整个研究过程中整合定性和定量工作的合法性标准。我们的整合观点也适用于调查结果的应用,这是一个与我们的咨询实践方法中固有的参与过程相一致的想法。最后,我们讨论并说明了合法性标准在咨询研究和评估中的应用。

更新日期:2021-02-25
down
wechat
bug