This article proposes a critical analysis of the historical and ideological process that has led to the recently-defunct Parti quebecois' (PQ) Charte de la laicite. It shows that this legislative project, as an attempt to renew Quebec's nationalism, amplified the struggles and tensions that characterize the normative source of the national nexus. More specifically, this article reveals that two carrier groups – the liberal-pluralists, on the one hand, and the republican-conservatives, on the other – have actively fought to get access to that normative source, trying ultimately to spread their national nexus's representations as the legitimate ones. Hence, the former group suggests an individualist-civic view for Quebec's nationalism that embraces immigrant groups, Anglo-Quebecois's minority, native peoples, and the francophone majority, while the latter suggests a collectivist-civic view for it anchoring into French-Canadian nationalism. Therefore, two distinct integration models are confronted, where liberal-pluralists fought against PQ's Charter of Secularism continuing to sustain interculturalism and where republican-conservatives nevertheless support PQ's Charter.

中文翻译：

---

揭露 National Nexus 的代表：魁北克案例

本文对导致最近解散的魁北克党 (PQ) Charte de la laicite 的历史和意识形态过程进行了批判性分析。它表明，这个立法项目，作为更新魁北克民族主义的尝试，放大了表征民族关系规范来源的斗争和紧张局势。更具体地说，这篇文章揭示了两个载体团体——一方面是自由多元主义者，另一方面是共和党保守主义者——积极争取获得该规范来源，最终试图传播他们的民族关系的陈述作为合法的。因此，前一组对魁北克民族主义提出了个人主义公民观点，包括移民群体、盎格鲁-魁北克少数民族、土著人民、和法语国家占多数，而后者则暗示了一种集体主义公民观点，因为它植根于法裔加拿大民族主义。因此，面临着两种截然不同的整合模式，自由多元主义者反对 PQ 的世俗主义宪章继续维持跨文化主义，而共和党保守派则支持 PQ 的宪章。