Since Carol Gilligan published her masterpiece, In a Different Voice, many scholars, especially feminist scholars in various fields, including moral theory, philosophy, and political and legal theory, have been inspired to establish a more inclusive approach to social injustice as well as sexual inequality. The purpose of this article is to explore the depth and expanse of the ethics of care for its potential as a political philosophy. To pursue this end, the article analyzes first the main claims of care ethics by responding to its typical counterarguments, which criticize the ethics of care as being too dependent on gender differences, particularism, and essentialism. The second section examines three challenges that care ethics poses to the male-oriented mainstream of political philosophy, especially the theory of justice. The ethics of care provides us with a new approach to moral and political issues because it focuses responsively on social injustice, proposes a new idea of relational self and takes the social connection model to justice. With these three perspectives proposed by the ethics of care in mind, the article turns its eyes to global implications of care ethics by referring to the issue of the “comfort women” of Japanese troops during the Second World War.

中文翻译：

---

为什么护理伦理成为全球关注的问题？

自从卡罗尔·吉利根 (Carol Gilligan) 发表她的杰作《不同的声音》以来，许多学者，尤其是道德理论、哲学、政治和法律理论等各个领域的女权主义学者受到启发，建立了一种更加包容的方法来解决社会不公正和性问题。不等式。本文的目的是探讨护理伦理作为一种政治哲学的潜力的深度和广度。为了实现这一目标，本文首先通过回应其典型的反驳来分析护理伦理的主要主张，这些反驳批评护理伦理过于依赖性别差异、特殊主义和本质主义。第二部分考察了关怀伦理对以男性为导向的政治哲学主流，尤其是正义理论提出的三个挑战。关怀伦理为我们提供了一种解决道德和政治问题的新方法，因为它以回应的方式关注社会不公正，提出了一种新的关系自我观念，并将社会联系模型推向了正义。考虑到护理伦理提出的这三个观点，本文通过提及二战期间日军“慰安妇”问题，将目光转向护理伦理的全球影响。