To situate reuse, as a critical condition of the cultures of education, practice and research in interiors, is an approach that ensures that ambiguity, contingency, and a variety of particular sensibilities around on-site approaches to the production of knowledge about the discipline, can be established as an essential component of its primary values and principles. It is my view that this approach is useful to the discipline because on this basis the cultures of the interior can be made distinct from other spatial practices. This approach can therefore shape its own distinct identity. This is also a useful course of action because the condition of the interior can be recognised to be one that can be predicated on its unfixedness, and upon a sense of perpetual nascent emergence; a condition that in other work others and myself have described as a sense of the becoming of the interior . In my view this is critical to its formation and ultimately the understanding of the interior. In short, this perspective article, the title of which is derived from my keynote talk at the 2016 IDEC conference , will elaborate on three aspects of reuse that might be considered as fundamental elements of the conditions of fluidity and indeterminacy of the interior, entities that I propose are essential to its existence and comprehension. It will outline three conditions: proximities, inhabitations and identities, because they encapsulate what I consider to be the fundamental matter of the interior. These are titled because, in my view, the various cultures of the subject of the interior, the cultures of education, research, practice and professionalism, all rely on a comprehension of the principles and processes of reuse. See Brooker, Graeme. Interior Architecture: The Unfixed and The Becoming. Inner Magazine, October 2015. http://www.innermagazine.org/interior-architecture-the-unfixed-and-the-becoming/ also see Hollis, Ed (Eds.) Unbecoming. IDEA Journal 2013. ISSN 1445/5412 Brooker, Graeme, Keynote Conference Speech 'Proximities, Inhabitations, Identities: Interior Matter(s)', IDEC conference, Portland Oregon, March 2016.

中文翻译：

---

内部事务：邻近、居住、身份

将再利用作为室内教育、实践和研究文化的一个关键条件，是一种确保围绕现场方法产生有关学科知识的模糊性、偶然性和各种特殊敏感性的方法，可以被确立为其主要价值观和原则的重要组成部分。我认为这种方法对学科很有用，因为在此基础上，室内文化可以与其他空间实践区分开来。因此，这种方法可以塑造自己独特的身份。这也是一个有用的行动方案，因为内部的状况可以被认为是一种可以根据其不固定性和一种永久新生的感觉来预测的状况。在其他作品中，我和其他人都将这种状态描述为一种内部生成感。在我看来，这对其形成以及最终对内部的理解至关重要。简而言之，这篇观点文章的标题来自我在 2016 年 IDEC 会议上的主题演讲，将详细阐述再利用的三个方面，这些方面可能被视为内部流动性和不确定性条件的基本要素，实体我建议对于它的存在和理解至关重要。它将概述三个条件：邻近、居住和身份，因为它们包含了我认为是内部基本问题的内容。这些标题是因为在我看来，室内主题的各种文化，教育文化，研究文化，实践和专业精神，都依赖于对重用原则和过程的理解。见布鲁克，格雷姆。室内建筑：未固定和正在形成。内部杂志，2015 年 10 月。http://www.innermagazine.org/interior-architecture-the-unfixed-and-the-becoming/ 另见 Hollis, Ed (Eds.) Unbecoming。IDEA 期刊 2013。ISSN 1445/5412 Brooker, Graeme，主题会议演讲“邻近、居住、身份：内部问题”，IDEC 会议，俄勒冈州波特兰，2016 年 3 月。