Research on gender differences in the allocation and evaluation of three main components of academic work (i.e., research, teaching, and service) is very informative, and we argue that it may point to potential sources of the disparity in academic industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists’ experiences. We also propose the addition of a few issues to the research agenda set forth by Gardner, Ryan, and Snoeyink (2018) with the belief that attention to these issues will help address the gender disparity.

中文翻译：

---

学术界的三个困境：学术、教学和服务方面的性别差异

关于学术工作的三个主要组成部分（即研究、教学和服务）的分配和评估中的性别差异的研究非常有用，我们认为它可能指向学术产业和组织（IO ) 心理学家的经验。我们还建议在 Gardner、Ryan 和 Snoeyink（2018 年）提出的研究议程中增加一些问题，并相信对这些问题的关注将有助于解决性别差异。