Meta-analytic research indicates that harassment experiences are more strongly correlated with harassment climate than with any other predictor of harassment (Willness, Steel, & Lee, 2007). Medeiros and Griffith (2019) highlight the significance of climate in their proposed framework for improving sexual harassment and assault training. However, we argue from research and practical experience that the current measure of harassment climate needs to be elaborated and extended to improve its practical utility. In this commentary, we provide a brief overview of the current harassment measure, identify its limitations, and propose solutions to gain a better understanding of the situational factors that predict sexual harassment training effectiveness and, ultimately, sexual harassment experiences.

中文翻译：

---

改善性骚扰氛围的衡量

元分析研究表明，骚扰经历与骚扰气氛的相关性比与骚扰的任何其他预测因素的相关性更强（Willness、Steel 和 Lee，2007 年）。Medeiros 和 Griffith（2019 年）在他们提出的改善性骚扰和攻击培训的框架中强调了气候的重要性。然而，我们从研究和实践经验中认为，当前的骚扰氛围衡量标准需要详细阐述和扩展，以提高其实际效用。在本评论中，我们简要概述了当前的骚扰措施，确定了其局限性，并提出了解决方案，以更好地了解预测性骚扰培训有效性和最终性骚扰经历的情境因素。