Gardner, Ryan, and Snoeyink (2018) emphasize the need to assess human capital and market factors that may contribute to gender differences in income and suggest that such data are not readily available. As members of the Institutional Research Committee, we thought it important to provide some evidence addressing the focal article's main points using what data are available. Specifically, we conducted ad hoc analyses using data from the 2016 SIOP Income and Employment Survey, with the intent of providing additional context related to employment and compensation for industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists. Our sample included only respondents who indicated that they worked full time and who provided their gender (n = 1,069). These analyses answer Gardner et al.’s call to examine factors that explain the income gap between men and women within the field.

中文翻译：

---

我们不知道的：来自 SIOP 收入和同行评审就业调查的答案

Gardner、Ryan 和 Snoeyink（2018 年）强调有必要评估可能导致收入性别差异的人力资本和市场因素，并建议此类数据不易获得。作为机构研究委员会的成员，我们认为使用可用数据提供一些证据来解决焦点文章的要点很重要。具体来说，我们使用 2016 年 SIOP 收入和就业调查的数据进行了临时分析，旨在为工业和组织 (IO) 心理学家提供与就业和薪酬相关的额外背景。我们的样本仅包括表示他们全职工作并提供性别的受访者（n= 1,069)。这些分析回应了 Gardner 等人的呼吁，即研究解释该领域男女收入差距的因素。