当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Political Sociology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Institutional Relations Rather Than Clashes of Civilizations: When and How Is Religion Compatible with Democracy?
International Political Sociology ( IF 3.5 ) Pub Date : 2016-07-19 , DOI: 10.1093/ips/olw011
Jocelyne Cesari , Jonathan Fox

This study develops and examines the concept of hegemonic religion and its relationship with democracy. A religion is hegemonic not only when the state grants that religion exclusive material and political privileges and benefits, but also when the religion is a core element of national identity and citizenship. We empirically examine the link between hegemonic religion and democracy using the Religion and State round 2 (RAS2), Polity, and CIRI datasets. We specifically use religious education policy, financing of religion, and religiously based laws as measures of the extent of religious hegemony in a state. We find that the presence of these religiously hegemonic traits, especially in combination, is strongly associated with a lack of democracy. However, it is possible for democracies to have some hegemonic features but not all of them.

中文翻译:

制度关系比文明冲突更重要:宗教何时,如何与民主兼容?

这项研究发展并检验了霸权宗教的概念及其与民主的关系。宗教不仅是国家的独裁者,而且在政治上是民族身份和公民权的核心要素时,它是霸权主义。我们使用宗教和国家第二回合(RAS2),政体和CIRI数据集,从经验上考察了霸权宗教与民主之间的联系。我们专门使用宗教教育政策,宗教融资和基于宗教的法律来衡量一个国家宗教霸权的程度。我们发现,这些宗教霸权特征的存在,特别是两者的结合,与缺乏民主紧密相关。但是,民主国家有可能具有某些霸权特征,但不是全部。
更新日期:2016-07-19
down
wechat
bug