This article seeks to clarify the disagreement between theological interpretation of Scripture and academic biblical scholarship that is governed by the historical-critical method. First, it sets forth four basic convictions of theological interpretation, that is, presuppositions about the text's relationship to God and church that are crucial for fruitful Christian exegesis of the Bible. Second, it discusses the hermeneutical implications that follow, with particular reference to divine authorship and spiritual interpretation. Third, it criticizes the methodological assumptions and totalizing claims of historical criticism as ultimately inimical to the kind of scriptural reading practices necessary for the church's faith and theology.

中文翻译：

---

神学解释的诠释学：圣经、圣经学术和历史批评

本文旨在澄清对圣经的神学解释与受历史批判方法支配的学术圣经学术之间的分歧。首先，它提出了神学解释的四个基本信念，即关于文本与上帝和教会关系的预设，这对于基督教徒对圣经的有效解经至关重要。其次，它讨论了随后的解释学含义，特别是关于神圣作者和精神解释。第三，它批评历史批评的方法论假设和总体主张，认为它最终不利于教会信仰和神学所必需的那种圣经阅读实践。