当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ecclesiastical Law Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How Relevant to the United Kingdom are the ‘Religious’ Cases of the US Supreme Court?
Ecclesiastical Law Journal ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2016-08-08 , DOI: 10.1017/s0956618x16000533
Frank Cranmer

High-profile cases in the Supreme Court of the United States (‘SCOTUS’) on religion tend to attract a certain amount of academic comment in the United Kingdom but US judgments are cited only infrequently by the superior courts in the UK. In return, SCOTUS rarely cites foreign judgments at all. The reason, it is suggested, is that the effect given by the First Amendment to the US Constitution is to render US case law of less relevance to the UK than, for example, judgments from jurisdictions such as Canada and Australia.

中文翻译:

美国最高法院的“宗教”案件与英国的相关性如何?

美国最高法院 (“SCOTUS”) 中备受瞩目的宗教案件往往会在英国引起一定程度的学术评论,但英国高等法院很少引用美国的判决。作为回报,SCOTUS 很少引用外国判决。有人认为,原因是美国宪法第一修正案的效果是使美国判例法与英国的相关性低于加拿大和澳大利亚等司法管辖区的判决。
更新日期:2016-08-08
down
wechat
bug