In recent years, those involved in regulating, forming or advising faith communities have had much to contend with: the expansion of the vicarious liability doctrine, the status of ministers of religion and the decision in Shergill v Khaira, not to mention the General Data Protection Regulation. These issues share a common denominator: they require faith communities to give close consideration to the values which they seek to articulate and foster in the expression of their own autonomy and right of self-determination. That is, they serve as a prompt to reconnect with the intellectus and vinculo iuris of their own ecclesial norms. This article is intended to encourage such an exercise and to contribute to a discussion of the potential points of collaboration between the civil law and faith communities in securing dispute resolution by which ecclesial values may be accommodated.

中文翻译：

---

De minimis non curat lex：深刻的司法统一？

近年来，那些参与监管、组建或建议信仰社区的人面临着许多问题：替代责任理论的扩展、宗教部长的地位以及宗教信仰团体的决定。谢吉尔 v 凯拉，更不用说《通用数据保护条例》了。这些问题有一个共同点：它们要求信仰团体密切考虑他们在表达自己的自主权和自决权时寻求表达和培养的价值观。也就是说，它们充当与重新连接的提示知识分子和长春花他们自己的教会规范。本文旨在鼓励这种做法，并有助于讨论民法和信仰团体之间的潜在合作点，以确保解决争端，从而可以适应教会价值观。