This paper highlights two aspects of Stanley Hauerwas's thought: philosophical ethics, which consists of second-order methodological claims; and moral theology, which consists of first-order, local, unsystematic moral descriptions. I show how the philosophical ethics relates to the moral theology by proposing a set of rules that constitute a ‘grammar’ of Hauerwas's thought. These rules are asymmetrical in that later rules presuppose earlier rules but earlier rules do not presuppose later rules. Each rule corresponds to texts that Hauerwas recommends and relies upon. The first rule prioritizes MacIntyre's concept of non-foundational ‘practical wisdom’. The second rule, which draws on Aristotle, Wittgenstein, Anscombe and Kovesi to stress the impossibility of separating agent from act, influences the third rule that ethics is moral description. The fourth rule uses ‘postliberal’ theologians and draws on the liturgy alongside Barth and Yoder, in order to redescribe the shape of Christian life in liberal modernity.

中文翻译：

---

我如何看待Hauerwas对神学的看法

本文着重介绍了斯坦利·豪瓦斯（Stanley Hauerwas）的思想的两个方面：哲学伦理学，由二阶方法论主张组成；道德神学，由一阶，局部，非系统的道德描述组成。我通过提出一套构成Hauerwas思想的“语法”的规则，来说明哲学伦理学与道德神学的关系。这些规则是不对称的，因为后面的规则以前面的规则为前提，但是前面的规则不以后面的规则为前提。每个规则对应于Hauerwas推荐并依靠的文本。第一条规则优先考虑了麦金太尔的非基础“实践智慧”的概念。第二条规则借鉴了亚里斯多德，维特根斯坦，安斯科姆和科维西的思想，强调不可能将行为主体与行为主体分开，影响道德是道德描述的第三条规则。第四条规则使用“后自由主义”神学家，并与巴思和约德一起借鉴礼拜仪式，以重新描述自由现代性中基督徒生活的形态。