Recent soteriological discourse has worried that atonement theologies like satisfaction and penal substitution have potentially damaging effects like inoculating us to our violence, further buttressing retributive justice, and inducing passive acquiescence in the face of abuse. Though legitimate concerns in their own right, this essay investigates whether certain views on the atonement do in fact produce the issues of concern. By investigating the thought of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who believed that God had to punish sin, this article will seek to identify the complex nuances in Bonhoeffer's work that would potentially safeguard against some of the concerns being raised about atonement theologies like his.

中文翻译：

---

暴力、赎罪和报复性正义：朋霍费尔作为一个测试案例

最近的救赎论话语担心赎罪神学，如满足感和刑罚替代，具有潜在的破坏性影响，例如使我们陷入暴力，进一步支持报复性正义，以及在面对虐待时诱导被动默许。尽管担忧本身是合理的，但本文调查了某些关于赎罪的观点是否确实产生了关注的问题。通过调查迪特里希·朋霍费尔（Dietrich Bonhoeffer）的思想，他相信上帝必须惩罚罪恶，本文将试图找出朋霍费尔著作中复杂的细微差别，这些细微差别可能会防止人们对像他这样的赎罪神学提出的一些担忧。