Postliberal theology has been a topic of considerable theological debate over the past few decades. In his 2011 book Another Reformation, Peter Ochs deploys a postliberal theological model for the purpose of developing a sophisticated understanding of the future of interreligious relations. Ochs argues that postliberal theology is a reparative theology focusing on alleviating human suffering. He argues that the Christian idea of supersessionism may be the most challenging for Christians to confront as they explore avenues for making interreligious dialogue more effective. Ochs critiques the Mennonite theologian John Howard Yoder's understanding of Zionism as Jewish Constantianism for being an instance of an ostensibly postliberal theology losing its way. In this essay, I offer a critique of Ochs's reading of Yoder, claiming that Yoder's view actually mirrors an important intra-Jewish debate about the relationship between political power and piety, and retrieves an ingenious contribution of both early Judaism and early Christianity that is effaced in today's growing Constantinian approach to Christian imperialism and Jewish nationalism.

中文翻译：

---

基督教迷信主义、犹太复国主义和当代场景

在过去的几十年里，后自由主义神学一直是神学争论的主题。在他 2011 年的著作《另一种改革》中，彼得·奥克斯部署了一个后自由主义神学模型，目的是发展对宗教间关系未来的复杂理解。奥克斯认为，后自由主义神学是一种专注于减轻人类痛苦的修复神学。他认为，当基督徒探索使宗教间对话更有效的途径时，基督教的基督教观念可能是最具挑战性的。奥克斯批评门诺派神学家约翰霍华德约德将犹太复国主义理解为犹太君士坦丁主义，认为它是表面上后自由主义神学迷失方向的一个例子。在这篇文章中，我对 Ochs 对 Yoder 的阅读提出了批评，声称 Yoder '