I aim to present a solution to the apparent paradox of the Tractatus by means of a minimalist reading grounded in the idea that the correct logical symbolism alone “finally solves” in essentials the philosophical problems. I argue that although the sentences of the Tractatus are nonsensical, rules presented in its symbolism are not. The symbolism itself expresses only a priori rules of logic through schematic variables that do not say anything. I argue that this reading correctly expresses the ladder structure of the book, and that it can account for Wittgenstein’s critique of the Tractatus in Some Remarks on Logical Form. The first footholds are always the most difficult, until acquiring the necessary coordination. The coincidence of the name between the foot and the foot makes the explanation more difficult. Be especially careful to not raise, at the same time, the foot and the foot. (Cort azar)

中文翻译：

---

爬梯的说明（维特根斯坦《悲惨世界》的极简主义）

我的目的是通过极简主义的阅读来提出一种对Tractatus显而易见的悖论的解决方案，该思想基于这样一个思想，即正确的逻辑符号论仅在本质上“最终解决”了哲学问题。我认为，尽管《 Tractatus》的句子是荒谬的，但在其象征意义中提出的规则却并非如此。象征主义本身只通过不说明任何内容的逻辑示意图变量来表达逻辑的先验规则。我认为这种读法正确地表达了本书的阶梯结构，并且可以解释维特根斯坦在《逻辑形式的某些评论》中对《论纲》的批评。在获得必要的协调之前，第一个立足点总是最困难的。脚和脚之间的名称重合使得解释更加困难。要特别小心，不要加注，同时，脚和脚。（冒犯危险）