当前位置: X-MOL 学术Metaphilosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Virtue Epistemology, Enhancement, and Control
Metaphilosophy ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2018-04-01 , DOI: 10.1111/meta.12304
J. Adam Carter 1
Affiliation  

An interesting aspect of Ernest Sosa’s (2017) recent thinking is that enhanced performances (e.g., the performance of an athlete under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug) fall short of aptness, and this is because such enhanced performances do not issue from genuine competences on the part of the agent. In this paper, I explore in some detail the implications of such thinking in Sosa’s wider virtue epistemology, with a focus on cases of cognitive enhancement. A certain puzzle is then highlighted, and the solution proposed draws from both the recent moral responsibility literature on guidance control (e.g., Fischer and Ravizza 1998; Fischer 2012) as well as from work on cognitive integration in the philosophy of mind and cognitive science (e.g., Clark and Chalmers 1998; Clark 2008; Pritchard 2010; Palermos 2014; Carter 2017).

中文翻译:

美德认识论、增强和控制

欧内斯特·索萨 (Ernest Sosa) (2017) 最近的想法的一个有趣方面是,增强的表现(例如,运动员在提高成绩的药物影响下的表现)达不到适应性,这是因为这种增强的表现并非来自真正的代理人的能力。在本文中,我详细探讨了这种思想在 Sosa 更广泛的美德认识论中的含义,重点是认知增强的案例。然后突出显示了某个难题,所提出的解决方案来自最近关于指导控制的道德责任文献(例如,Fischer 和 Ravizza 1998;Fischer 2012)以及心理哲学和认知科学中的认知整合工作(例如,Clark 和 Chalmers 1998;Clark 2008;Pritchard 2010;Palermos 2014;Carter 2017)。
更新日期:2018-04-01
down
wechat
bug