In How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims, Alex Voorhoeve suggests accommodating intuitions about duties in rescue cases by combining aggregative and non-aggregative elements into one theory. In this article, I discuss two problems Voorhoeve's theory faces as a result of requiring a cyclic pattern of choice, and argue that his attempt to solve them does not succeed.

中文翻译：

---

在救援案件中汇总相关索赔？

在我们应该如何汇总相互竞争的索赔, Alex Voorhoeve 建议通过将聚合和非聚合元素结合到一个理论中来适应关于救援案件中职责的直觉。在本文中，我讨论了 Voorhoeve 的理论由于需要循环选择模式而面临的两个问题，并认为他解决这些问题的尝试没有成功。