This article seeks to explain when governments are more likely to take an intergovernmental approach to resolving global collective problems rather than step back and encourage (or simply allow) nongovernmental actors to become the main global governors. The authors suggest that an important factor driving this choice is the domestic ideological leanings of powerful states toward greater or lesser government activism. Such ideologies connect domestic preferences to international ones. They also lead to the establishment of domestic institutions that, in turn, facilitate the emergence of international organizations. Using these arguments, the authors develop a set of inferences regarding the likelihood that governments will establish and join intergovernmental organizations. The authors test their hypotheses through a study of global governance in the education realm, and also apply a series of statistical analyses covering developments in all issue-areas over the last century and a half.

中文翻译：

---

政府间主义与非政府主义之间的选择：将国内偏好投射到全球治理

本文试图解释政府何时更有可能采取政府间方法来解决全球集体问题，而不是退后一步并鼓励（或简单地允许）非政府行为者成为主要的全球管理者。作者认为，推动这一选择的一个重要因素是强国的国内意识形态倾向于或多或少的政府激进主义。这种意识形态将国内偏好与国际偏好联系起来。它们还导致建立国内机构，进而促进国际组织的出现。使用这些论点，作者对政府建立和加入政府间组织的可能性进行了一系列推论。