The purpose of this review was to evaluate the quality of research focused on the effects of telehealth‐mediated behavior‐analytic assessments and interventions on client outcomes. The majority of studies utilized a single‐case methodology (n = 44; 81%), while 10 studies (19%) used a group design. Of the 246 single‐case designs, 99 (40%) met design standards with or without reservation. For the 10 group design studies, 7 (70%) met the design standards. When evaluating the evidence offered according to the prime independent variable (e.g., behavior assessment, intervention designed for behavior reduction, and intervention designed to establish or strengthen behavior), the literature supports the use of telehealth to conduct behavior assessments and provide interventions designed to establish or strengthen behavior. Additional research is necessary to establish the use of telehealth to conduct interventions designed for behavior reduction. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

中文翻译：

---

远程医疗介导的行为评估和干预对客户结果的影响：质量审查

本综述的目的是评估以远程医疗为中介的行为分析评估和干预对客户结果的影响的研究质量。大多数研究使用单案例方法（n= 44; 81%)，而 10 项研究 (19%) 使用了小组设计。在 246 个单案例设计中，99 个（40%）符合设计标准，有无保留。对于 10 个组设计研究，7 个 (70%) 符合设计标准。在根据主要自变量（例如，行为评估、旨在减少行为的干预措施以及旨在建立或加强行为的干预措施）评估提供的证据时，文献支持使用远程医疗进行行为评估并提供旨在确定行为的干预措施。或加强行为。需要额外的研究来确定使用远程医疗来进行旨在减少行为的干预措施。讨论了对未来研究和实践的影响。