当前位置: X-MOL 学术Criminal Law and Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Reasonableness in Recklessness
Criminal Law and Philosophy ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2019-07-03 , DOI: 10.1007/s11572-019-09501-z
Findlay Stark

Recklessness involves unreasonable/unjustified risk-taking. The argument here is that recklessness in the criminal law is best understood as nevertheless containing an element of reasonableness. To be reckless, on this view, the defendant must reasonably believe that she is exposing others to a risk of harm. If the defendant’s belief about the risk being imposed by her conduct is un reasonable, she should not (normally) be considered reckless. This point is most important in relation to offences of endangerment where recklessness sets the outer limits of criminal liability.

中文翻译:

鲁ck的合理性

鲁ck涉及不合理/不合理的冒险。这里的论点是,最好理解刑法中的鲁ck行为仍然包含合理性。为了鲁ck,此观点认为,被告必须合理地认为自己正在使他人遭受伤害。如果被告对自己的行为所带来的风险的看法不合理,则不应(通常)认为她是鲁re的。这一点与危险行为有关,其中鲁offense设置了刑事责任的外部界限。
更新日期:2019-07-03
down
wechat
bug