:The distinction between brute luck and option luck is fundamental for luck egalitarianism. Many luck egalitarians write as if it could be used to specify which outcomes people should be held responsible for. In this paper, I argue that the distinction can’t be used this way. In fact, luck egalitarians tend to rely instead on rough intuitive judgements about individual responsibility. This makes their view vulnerable to what’s known as the neutrality objection. I show that attempts to avoid this objection are unsuccessful. I conclude that until it provides a better account of attributing responsibility, luck egalitarianism remains incomplete.

中文翻译：

---

迎合责任：蛮运、期权运气和对运气平等主义的中立反对

: 蛮运气和期权运气之间的区别是运气平均主义的基础。许多运气平等主义者写道，好像它可以用来指定人们应该对哪些结果负责。在本文中，我认为不能以这种方式使用这种区别。事实上，运气平等主义者倾向于依靠对个人责任的粗略直觉判断。这使得他们的观点容易受到所谓的中立异议. 我表明，试图避免这种反对意见是不成功的。我的结论是，在它更好地解释责任归属之前，运气平均主义仍然是不完整的。