当前位置: X-MOL 学术Philosophy Compass › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy
Philosophy Compass ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2018-05-06 , DOI: 10.1111/phc3.12497
John B. Min 1 , James K. Wong 2
Affiliation  

Philosophy Compass. 2018;13:e12497. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12497 Abstract This article offers a comprehensive review of the major theoretical issues and findings of the epistemic approaches to deliberative democracy. Section 2 surveys the norms and ideals of deliberative democracy in relation to deliberation's ability to “track the truth.” Section 3 examines the conditions under which deliberative mini‐ publics can “track the truth.” Section 4 discusses how “truth‐tracking” deliberative democracy is possible through the division of epistemic labor in a deliberative system.

中文翻译:

协商民主的认知方法

哲学指南针。2018; 13:e12497。https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12497摘要本文提供了对主要理论问题的全面回顾,以及对审议民主的认知方法的发现。第2节探讨了与审议“追踪真相”的能力有关的协商民主的规范和理想。第3节研究了协商性公众可以“追踪真相”的条件。第四部分讨论了如何通过在审议系统中划分认知劳动来实现“真相追踪”的审议民主。
更新日期:2018-05-06
down
wechat
bug