Despite a common agenda of normative analysis of the international order, philosophical work on international political morality and international law and legal scholarship have, until recently, worked at a distance from one another. The mutual suspicion can be traced to different aims and methodologies, including a divide between work on matters of deep structure, on the one hand, and practical institutional analysis and prescription, on the other. Yet international law is a key part of the normative practices of states, has a direct effect on state behavior, and, as a methodological matter, can contribute to good theorizing on matters of international ethics. Recently, philosophical work has demonstrated a greater engagement with the moral aspects of international law. One strand of scholarship has treated the rules of international law as a proper subject for philosophical inquiry. Another has used international legal rules to support moral arguments about aspects of the international order. Future dialogue and cooperation would benefit both fields, in particular on the challenges to global cooperation from nationalism and on strategies for allocating responsibilities among global actors for rectifying global harms.

中文翻译：

---

国际法和政治哲学：发现新的联系

尽管对国际秩序进行规范性分析有一个共同的议程，但直到最近，有关国际政治道德，国际法和法律学术的哲学研究仍相距遥远。相互怀疑可以追溯到不同的目标和方法，包括一方面在深层结构问题上的工作与另一方面，在实用的制度分析和规定之间的划分。然而，国际法是国家规范实践的重要组成部分，对国家行为具有直接影响，并且作为方法论上的问题，可以有助于对国际伦理问题进行良好的理论化。最近，哲学著作显示出对国际法道德方面的更多参与。一连串的奖学金将国际法规则视为哲学探究的适当主题。另一个使用国际法律规则来支持有关国际秩序方面的道德论证。未来的对话与合作将使这两个领域受益，特别是在民族主义对全球合作的挑战以及在全球行为者之间分配责任以纠正全球危害的战略方面。