Replicability is widely taken to ground the epistemic authority of science. However, in recent years, important published findings in the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences have failed to replicate, suggesting that these fields are facing a “replicability crisis.” For philosophers, the crisis should not be taken as bad news but as an opportunity to do work on several fronts, including conceptual analysis, history and philosophy of science, research ethics, and social epistemology. This article introduces philosophers to these discussions. First, I discuss precedents and evidence for the crisis. Second, I discuss methodological, statistical, and social-structural factors that have contributed to the crisis. Third, I focus on the philosophical issues raised by the crisis. Finally, I discuss proposed solutions and highlight the gaps that philosophers could focus on.

中文翻译：

---

科学哲学与复制危机

可复制性被广泛用来奠定科学的认知权威。但是，近年来，在社会，行为和生物医学科学领域的重要已发表研究成果未能重现，表明这些领域正面临“可复制性危机”。对于哲学家来说，危机不应被视为坏消息，而应作为在多个方面开展工作的机会，包括概念分析，科学的历史和哲学，研究伦理学和社会认识论。本文向哲学家介绍了这些讨论。首先，我讨论了这场危机的先例和证据。其次，我讨论了导致危机的方法，统计和社会结构因素。第三，我专注于危机引发的哲学问题。最后，