This article uses Ronald Dworkin's argument for the unity of value to explore the redemptive core of modern legal order. Dworkin establishes a formal unity: all legal claims reside within a linked framework of moral justification. However, Jean-Francois Lyotard's concept of the differend exposes a lingering gap. Arguments within a moral universe do inevitably converge, but such unity is only possible due to the formative violence enacted by such orders. Dworkin hopes to provide the definitive statement against moral subjectivity, but in its purest form, he proves precisely the opposite. The lesson to draw from Dworkin's work is that ‘justice’ is ultimately only the means by which political orders categorize and thereby sustain their own formative acts of exclusion under the guise of offering their redemption.

中文翻译：

---

正义的差异：德沃金《刺猬正义》中的暴力与救赎

本文运用罗纳德·德沃金的价值统一论，探讨现代法律秩序的救赎核心。德沃金建立了一种形式上的统一：所有的法律主张都存在于一个相互关联的道德辩护框架内。然而，让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔的差异概念暴露了一个挥之不去的空白。道德世界中的争论确实不可避免地会聚在一起，但这种统一只有在制定的形成性暴力的情况下才有可能经过这样的命令。德沃金希望提供反对道德主体性的明确陈述，但以最纯粹的形式，他证明了恰恰相反。从德沃金的著作中吸取的教训是，“正义”最终只是政治秩序分类的手段，从而以提供救赎为幌子维持其自身形成的排斥行为。