The paper addresses the methodological tensions between Husserl’s phenomenology and history by reinterpreting the Addendum III of the Krisis-work in view of genetic phenomenology. Thus, the paper starts out by retracing the traditional criticism against the unhistorical character of Husserl’s phenomenology as voiced by Heidegger, Adorno and others. Afterwards, it moves on to analyse the troubled relationship between static and genetic phenomenology, on the one hand, and between genetic phenomenology and empirical genesis, on the other hand. Finally, it arrives at a step by step methodological reconstruction of Husserl’s considerations on the “origin of geometry”, which are regarded to be an application of the methods of genetic phenomenology to the field of history.

中文翻译：

---

Zur geschichtlichen Wende der genetischen Phänomenologie。危机之贝拉热三世的解释（Eine Interpretation der Beilage III der Krisis）

该论文通过从遗传现象学的角度重新解释危机工作的附录 III，解决了胡塞尔的现象学和历史之间的方法论上的紧张关系。因此，本文首先回顾了对海德格尔、阿多诺等人所表达的胡塞尔现象学非历史特征的传统批评。然后，它一方面继续分析静态现象学与遗传现象学之间的复杂关系，另一方面分析遗传现象学与经验发生学之间的复杂关系。最后，它对胡塞尔关于“几何起源”的思考进行了逐步的方法论重构，这被认为是发生现象学方法在历史领域的应用。