Subject-sensitive invariantism posits surprising connections between a person's knowledge and features of her environment that are not paradigmatically epistemic features. But which features of a person's environment have this distinctive connection to knowledge? Traditional defenses of subject-sensitive invariantism emphasize features that matter to the subject of the knowledge-attribution. Call this pragmatic encroachment. A more radical thesis usually goes ignored: knowledge is sensitive to moral facts, whether or not those moral facts matter to the subject. Call this moral encroachment. This article argues that, insofar as there are good arguments for pragmatic encroachment, there are also good arguments for moral encroachment.

中文翻译：

---

实用主义侵占与道德侵占

主体敏感的不变性在一个人的知识和她的环境特征之间建立了令人惊讶的联系，这些联系不是范式上的认知特征。但是，一个人所处环境的哪些特征与知识具有这种独特的联系？主题敏感不变性的传统防御强调对知识归因主题重要的特征。称之为务实的侵犯。一个更激进的论点通常被忽视：知识对道德事实很敏感，无论这些道德事实对主题是否重要。称之为道德侵犯。本文认为，就实用主义侵占有充分的理由而言，道德侵占也有正当理由。