The purpose of this study is to investigate the researchers' approach to the publication of and misconceptions in regard with scientific outputs and affecting factors. The present study was carried out using exploratory qualitative research method and semi-structured interviews in 2017. The research community comprised of faculty members, editors of journals, jury of papers and dissertations, researchers, and graduate students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. The sample size of the research was firstly selected through targeted sampling and then with snowball method. The MAXQDA v10 software was used to analyze the findings. Regarding the researchers' approach, a total number of 5 themes were identified. The lengthy process of arbitrating journals and the requirement for a university to publish a specific scientific output leads to inappropriate approaches to the dissemination of scientific outputs. It seems that revising quantitative views on the work of researchers and the development of ethics of science, with emphasis on compliance with the criteria of writing, quality and education of research misconduct in the form of appropriate training and supervision courses.

中文翻译：

---

发现医学科学大学研究人员和教授对科学产出的有偏见和无偏见出版的看法和方法：一项定性研究

本研究的目的是调查研究人员在科学成果和影响因素方面的发表方法和误解。本研究于 2017 年使用探索性定性研究方法和半结构化访谈进行。 研究社区由大不里士医科大学的教职员工、期刊编辑、论文和论文评审团、研究人员和研究生组成。研究的样本量首先通过有针对性的抽样，然后再用滚雪球法进行选择。MAXQDA v10 软件用于分析结果。关于研究人员的方法，总共确定了 5 个主题。仲裁期刊的冗长过程以及大学发表特定科学成果的要求导致了科学成果传播的不当方法。似乎修改了对研究人员工作和科学伦理发展的定量观点，强调以适当的培训和监督课程的形式遵守写作标准、质量和研究不端行为的教育。