Co-located models to address intimate partner violence and sexual violence, such as Family Justice Centers (FJC) and Multi-Agency Model Centers (MAMC), have emerged as promising practices to meet the needs of survivors. Although implementation of FJCs and MAMCs is widespread and supported by a recent increase in funding, little is known about the effectiveness of these models. This systematic review synthesizes and critically analyzes the peer-reviewed and grey literature focused on evaluating FJCs and MAMCs in the United States. A systematic search of terms pertaining to intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and co-located models was conducted using 11 computerized article databases and 15 center and organization websites. Thirteen studies were included in the final sample, most of which were government or agency-initiated reports. Over half of the studies were process evaluations and four were outcome evaluations. Of the outcome evaluations, none included a comparison group and two used a longitudinal design. Overall, the studies largely focused on organizational outcomes as opposed to survivor outcomes. Despite the lack of information pertaining to survivor outcomes, study findings indicated a high degree of provider and survivor satisfaction with co-located models. Although the research on co-located models – such as FJCs and MAMCs – is growing, evidence about the models’ impact on survivor outcomes related to safety and well-being is inconclusive. Using methodologically rigorous approaches to evaluation design and data analysis, future research should focus on exploring the relationship between coordination, collaboration, and survivor outcomes.

诸如家庭司法中心（FJC）和多机构模型中心（MAMC）等用于解决亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力问题的共同定位模型已经成为满足幸存者需求的有前途的做法。尽管FJC和MAMC的实施是广泛的，并且得到了最近资金的增加的支持，但是对于这些模型的有效性知之甚少。该系统综述综合并批判性地分析了同行评议和灰色文献，这些文献集中于评估美国的FJC和MAMC。使用11个计算机化的商品数据库和15个中心和组织网站，系统地搜索了与亲密伴侣暴力，性暴力和同居模式相关的术语。最终样本中包括13项研究，其中大多数是政府或机构发起的报告。一半以上的研究是过程评估，四项是结果评估。在结果评估中，没有一个包括比较组，有两个采用了纵向设计。总体而言，研究主要集中于组织结果而不是幸存者结果。尽管缺乏有关幸存者预后的信息，但研究结果表明，提供者和幸存者对共置模型的满意度很高。尽管对联合定位模型（例如FJC和MAMC）的研究正在增长，但有关模型对与安全和福祉相关的幸存者结果影响的证据尚无定论。使用方法学上严谨的方法进行评估设计和数据分析，未来的研究应着重于探索协调，协作和幸存者结果之间的关系。