Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss emerging practices in open evaluation, namely, the concept of co-evaluation and how research on evaluation developed within information science can contribute to enhance stakeholders and citizens’ involvement in open science. Design/methodology/approach A meta-evaluative and transdisciplinary approach – directed toward the intersection between information science, evaluation, competences management, sustainability transitions management and participatory methodologies – provided the basis for the identification and subsequent reflection on the levels of stakeholder participation embedded into ISO 16439’s (2014) methods for assessing the impact of libraries and on the domains and competences to be mobilized for (co)evaluation. The contributions of Engaged 2020 Action Catalogue, as well as several taxonomies of evaluator competences and the Council of Europe’s (2016) conceptual model of competences for a democratic culture were particularly relevant for this (re)construction process. Findings Two results of the line of research carried out since 2012 at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (Portugal) can significantly contribute to improve stakeholders’ participation in Open Science: ISO 16439’s systematization of methods and procedures for assessing the impact of libraries and the (co-)evaluation competency framework. Originality/value This paper presents the transdisciplinary concept of co-evaluation and examines the current epistemological challenges to science by analyzing the general tendency to openness through the lens of research on evaluation and participatory methods developed within information science.

中文翻译：

---

信息科学对新兴开放评估实践的贡献

目的本文的目的是讨论开放式评估中的新兴实践，即共同评估的概念，以及在信息科学领域内开展的评估研究如何有助于增强利益相关者和公民对开放式科学的参与。设计/方法论/方法一种针对信息科学，评估，能力管理，可持续性过渡管理和参与性方法学之间的交汇点的元评估和跨学科方法，为识别和随后反思利益相关者参与水平奠定了基础ISO 16439（2014）的方法，用于评估图书馆的影响以及对动员进行（共同）评估的领域和能力的影响。参与2020年行动目录的贡献，以及评估人员能力的几种分类法，以及欧洲委员会（2016年）民主文化能力概念模型，都与该（重建）过程相关。研究结果自NOVA de Lisboa大学（葡萄牙）社会科学与人文学院自2012年以来进行的两项研究可以极大地促进利益相关者对开放科学的参与：ISO 16439的评估方法和程序的系统化图书馆的影响和（共同）评估能力框架。