Abstract:Lacan and Winnicott are both profoundly psychosocial thinkers who shared an interest in the modern psyche and the alienation often considered endemic to it. From Freud, Lacan took the theory of narcissism (Borch-Jacobsen, 1991), which he developed into a wide-ranging critique of the psychosocial constitution of the modern subject. Winnicott, on the other hand, trained his eye on the environmental conditions necessary for feeling authentic, or 'real,' and the experiences that might produce alienation from this 'true' self, and encourage the formation of a narcissistic 'false' self (Donald W. Winnicott, 1990). In this context, Lacan and Winnicott's shared interest in the metaphor and function of the mirror, which has long provided an entry point for clinical and academic comparisons of their work, is a key point of orientation. This article seeks to explore and unpack the relationship between Lacan and Winnicott's interest in narcissism, alienation and the mirror, locating their thinking in relation to dominant philosophical conceptions of subjectivity and sociological understandings of modernity, dating from the seventeenth to the late nineteenth century. Situating Lacan and Winnicott on this terrain throws their theories of the mirror into relief in important ways. Not only is the 'modern' character of psychoanalysis foregrounded, the contribution it can make to social transformation is also affirmed.

中文翻译：

---

拉康和温尼科特作品中的现代性、异化和镜子

摘要：拉康和温尼科特都是深刻的社会心理思想家，他们对现代心理和通常被认为是其特有的异化有着共同的兴趣。拉康从弗洛伊德那里汲取了自恋理论（Borch-Jacobsen，1991），并将其发展为对现代主体的心理社会构成的广泛批判。另一方面，温尼科特将他的眼睛训练到感觉真实或“真实”所必需的环境条件，以及可能导致与“真实”自我疏远的经历，并鼓励形成自恋的“虚假”自我（唐纳德 W. 温尼科特，1990 年）。在这种背景下，拉康和温尼科特对镜子的隐喻和功能有着共同的兴趣，这长期以来为他们工作的临床和学术比较提供了切入点，是定位的关键点。本文试图探索和解开拉康和温尼科特对自恋、异化和镜子的兴趣之间的关系，将他们的思想与从 17 世纪到 19 世纪晚期的主体性和社会学对现代性的理解的主导哲学概念联系起来。将拉康和温尼科特置于这样的境地，他们的镜子理论以重要的方式浮出水面。不仅突出了精神分析的“现代”特征，而且肯定了它对社会变革的贡献。将他们的思想与主体性的主导哲学概念和对现代性的社会学理解联系起来，可以追溯到 17 世纪到 19 世纪后期。将拉康和温尼科特置于这样的境地，他们的镜子理论以重要的方式浮出水面。不仅突出了精神分析的“现代”特征，而且肯定了它对社会变革的贡献。将他们的思想与主体性的主导哲学概念和对现代性的社会学理解联系起来，可以追溯到 17 世纪到 19 世纪后期。将拉康和温尼科特置于这样的境地，他们的镜子理论以重要的方式浮出水面。不仅突出了精神分析的“现代”特征，而且肯定了它对社会变革的贡献。