The law sciences have built over time a series of empirical tools that leave behind the hard area of law, or what is called the theoretical, dogmatic, hermeneutic and the doctrine of legal sciences; This is not due to the lack of normative material to be analyzed, but to the ignorance of the jurists themselves, who seem to have lost the course of natural law, positive law, realism, trialism, pluralisms or parallelisms. Forgetting the schools, like the exegesis, the gloss, the pandects, the postglosers, the historical or the realist. Said forgetfulness has allowed the proliferation of empirical research, case studies or jurisprudential line, which has derived in the contempt of the study of principles, values and the ethos of the law. That is why, in this research, it is intended to make a small historical journey, as a theoretical framework; then the need for legal theory will be evident and, finally, some reflections will be attempted around the theoretical-juridical investigation.

中文翻译：

---

特尔里卡调查，多米蒂察，赫尔梅尼蒂卡，法西斯·拉·西恩西亚斯·尤里迪卡斯

随着时间的流逝，法学已经建立了一系列的经验工具，这些法学工具遗漏了法学的硬性领域，即法律科学的理论，教条，解释学和学说。这不是由于缺乏要分析的规范性材料，而是由于法学家自身的无知，他们似乎已经失去了自然法，实法，实在论，三元论，多元论或平行论的进程。忘掉学校，如训ege法，光泽度，装饰性，后光泽度，历史或现实主义者。所说的健忘使实证研究，案例研究或法理学界泛滥成灾，这是对蔑视法律的原则，价值和精神的研究所衍生的。这就是为什么在本研究中，它打算作为理论框架来进行一段小的历史旅程；