This article seeks to expose the judicial development of the rightto the water, in cases of exclusion of the provision of public services of aqueduct and sewerage for lack of infrastructure, from the construction of jurisprudential lines that have consolidated from the Constitutional Court and the State Council. In order to achieve this goal, the legal methodology proposed by the doctrineire Diego E. Lopez Medina in his publication “El derecho de los jueces”. Obligatory nature of the constitutional precedent, analysis of judgments and jurisprudential lines and theory of judicial law. The findings of his work show that both courts have sustained, over time, decisions of recognition and protection of access to water for human consumption as a fundamental right, both in its collective manifestation as well as in the individual. The characteristics of the precedent that have been set, its validity in the present and the methodological rigor for its study, are described in the body of the following text.

中文翻译：

---

哥伦比亚Desarrollo法律界的法律事务。基础设施和服务的专业技术保护和保护

本文旨在从宪法法院和国务院合并的法学体系建设中，排除因缺乏基础设施而提供水道和污水处理公共服务的情况下水权的司法发展。为了实现这一目标，教义迭戈·E·洛佩兹·麦地那教义主义者在其著作《法学概论》中提出了法律方法。宪法判例的强制性，判决和法理学界的分析以及司法法理论。他工作的调查结果表明，随着时间的推移，两个法院在其集体表现形式和个人表现形式中都维持承认和保护人类用水的一项基本决定，这是一项基本权利。