ABSTRACT

Tenure in collaborative housing remains under contextualized. Unpacking tenure contributes to internal differentiation of collaborative housing, its comparison to other modes of housing provision and the evaluation of potential benefits. This paper develops an ideal-typical typology of tenure through property regimes. These constitute social arrangements regarding the allocation of rights, rules and roles with respect to a resource. In terms of organizational characteristics, collaborative housing is based on limited common property, self-governance and sets of internal rules. While sharing these characteristics with other residential communities, collaborative housing can be differentiated by virtue of collectively held management and commissioning rights. Property regimes are a mediating variable for both positive and negative effects attributed to collaborative housing.

摘要

合作住房的使用权仍处于情境化之下。拆封权属有助于合作住房的内部差异化，它与其他住房提供模式的比较以及潜在收益的评估。本文通过财产制度发展了一种理想典型的权属类型。这些构成了关于资源分配权利、规则和角色的社会安排。就组织特征而言，合作住房基于有限的共同财产、自治和一套内部规则。在与其他住宅社区共享这些特征的同时，合作住房可以通过集体持有的管理和委托权来区分。