当前位置: X-MOL 学术Netherlands International Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Blurring Public and Private Security in Indonesia: Corporate Interests and Human Rights in a Fragile Environment
Netherlands International Law Review ( IF 1.3 ) Pub Date : 2018-07-01 , DOI: 10.1007/s40802-018-0107-8
Nigel D. White , Mary E. Footer , Kerry Senior , Mark van Dorp , Vincent Kiezebrink , Y. Wasi Gede Puraka , Ayudya Fajri Anzas

AbstractWhile legal and policy frameworks are based on a clear distinction between public and private security actors and functions, the reality on the ground in Indonesia reveals that there is a high level of corporate capture of public security services, including the military and police, who often operate alongside private security companies (mainly local, though there is some evidence of an emerging international presence), and the security personnel of companies engaged in the natural resources industry. This has led to serious human rights violations of indigenous peoples and other local inhabitants, who often find themselves entangled in protracted conflicts with multinational companies over access to their land. Two case studies involving fieldwork in the logging and palm oil sectors in Sumatra reveal a pernicious and deliberate erosion and violation of rights of local inhabitants across the spectrum of security actors, showing that public security actors are protecting corporate interests rather than performing public functions. The implications of these findings are considered in terms of legal responsibilities as well as access to justice. The article reasons towards what are argued to be necessary legal and policy changes.

中文翻译:

印度尼西亚公共和私人安全的模糊:脆弱环境中的企业利益和人权

摘要虽然法律和政策框架基于公共和私人安全行为者和职能之间的明确区分,但印度尼西亚的实际情况表明,公共安全服务的企业捕获水平很高,包括军队和警察,他们经常与私营安保公司(主要是本地安保公司,尽管有一些证据表明国际存在)以及从事自然资源行业的公司的安保人员一起运营。这导致土著人民和其他当地居民的人权受到严重侵犯,他们经常发现自己因获得土地而与跨国公司发生旷日持久的冲突。两个涉及苏门答腊伐木和棕榈油部门实地工作的案例研究揭示了当地居民在各种安全行为者范围内的权利受到有害和蓄意的侵蚀和侵犯,表明公共安全行为者正在保护公司利益而不是履行公共职能。从法律责任和司法救助的角度考虑了这些调查结果的影响。这篇文章的理由被认为是必要的法律和政策变化。
更新日期:2018-07-01
down
wechat
bug