This research is connected to a broader study of the costs and benefits of ADR in Maryland courts conducted by the Maryland Judiciary Administrative Office of the Courts, with funding by the State Justice Institute, SJI-13-N-128, in collaboration with Community Mediation Maryland; Bosserman Center for Dispute Resolution at Salisbury University; the Institute for Governmental Service and Research, University of Maryland, College Park; and the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law Center for Dispute Resolution. The authors thank the research team, judges, judicial staff, ADR practitioners, and litigants for all of their cooperation, assistance, and support. Caroline Harmon Darrow drafted portions of the original literature review and Haleigh LaChance drafted portions of the research report from which this article was drafted.

中文翻译：

---

ADR 有何不同？小额索偿法庭ADR与审判结果的比较

这项研究与马里兰州法院司法行政办公室在马里兰州法院进行的 ADR 成本和收益的更广泛研究相关，由州司法研究所 SJI-13-N-128 与社区调解合作提供资金马里兰州；索尔兹伯里大学 Bosserman 争议解决中心；马里兰大学帕克分校政府服务与研究学院；和马里兰大学弗朗西斯金凯里法学院争议解决中心。作者感谢研究团队、法官、司法人员、ADR 从业人员和诉讼当事人的合作、帮助和支持。Caroline Harmon Darrow 起草了原始文献综述的部分内容，Haleigh LaChance 起草了研究报告的部分内容，本文是从这些报告中起草的。