Purpose This paper proposes that the UKs exit from the EU is unlikely to impact heavily on the lived reality of Roma, given its negligible impact prior to Brexit. The paper sets out a critique of existing EU approaches to anti-Gypsyism that are based in discourses of racism and anti-nomadism and are typified in the EU hate crime agenda. The paper argues for recognition of the systemic social harms caused by discrimination against Roma in the EU and the commonality of their experience with other socially excluded groups that do not conform to the requirements of contemporary neoliberal capitalism. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach The paper comprises an opinion piece that sets out a critical examination of existing literature on policy and research in Romani studies and utilises theoretical work within criminology and social policy. Findings The paper explains the inability of existing EU approaches to tackle social harms experienced by Roma throughout the EU. In doing so it suggests that the UKs exit from the EU may not have a significant impact on Roma in the UK. Originality/value The paper challenges extant discourses and proposes new ways of thinking about anti-Gypsyism.

中文翻译：

---

英国脱欧后的罗姆人融合：对现有言论的挑战？

目的本文提出，英国退出欧盟不太可能对罗姆人的现实生活造成重大影响，因为在英国退欧之前，罗姆人的影响可忽略不计。该论文提出了对欧盟现有的反吉普赛主义方法的批评，这些方法基于种族主义和反游牧主义，并以欧盟仇恨犯罪议程为代表。该论文主张承认欧盟歧视罗姆人所造成的系统性社会损害，以及他们与其他不符合当代新自由主义资本主义要求的被社会排斥群体的经验的共同性。本文旨在讨论这些问题。设计/方法论/方法本文包含一个意见书，对罗曼语研究中有关政策和研究的现有文献进行了严格的审查，并利用了犯罪学和社会政策中的理论工作。调查结果本文解释了现有的欧盟方法无法解决整个欧盟范围内罗姆人遭受的社会伤害。这样做表明英国退出欧盟可能不会对英国的罗姆人产生重大影响。原创性/价值这篇论文挑战了现有的话语，并提出了有关反吉普赛思想的新方法。