Does, or should, social uprising lead to new legal form? Ukraine’s current situation following the Revolution of Dignity in 2013–2014, with continuing violent conflict in Donbas and Crimea, suggests that not only is it unclear how a ‘new’ form is assessed, but existing transitional policies and frameworks are unlikely to be clearly implemented and enforced. An alternative analysis of transformation is necessary to address the conflicting aftermath of uprising within a particular historical and cultural context. The transformation that is happening in Ukraine is a continuum that is intellectual and psychological as much as reforming judicial systems and governance. Thinking transformation differently opens onto narratives, complexity of causes and a plurality of ideas of future, resolutions and justice. Such a shift in thought and analysis, informed by narratives and grounded research, is necessary in order to try to understand the current pursuit of justice in Ukraine.

中文翻译：

---

从社会起义到法律形式

社会起义是否或应该导致新的法律形式？乌克兰在 2013 年至 2014 年尊严革命之后的现状，顿巴斯和克里米亚的持续暴力冲突表明，不仅不清楚如何评估“新”形式，而且现有的过渡政策和框架也不太可能得到明确实施并强制执行。有必要对转型进行另一种分析，以解决特定历史和文化背景下起义的冲突后果。乌克兰正在发生的转变是一个连续统一体，它是智力和心理的连续统一体，与司法系统和治理的改革一样多。思维转变以不同的方式打开了叙事、原因的复杂性以及对未来、解决方案和正义的多种想法。这种思想和分析的转变，