felt pressure to focus on risk and lacked an understanding in the strength-based approach. There were inconsistencies in practice which derived from poor roll-out of national training. Training and support to empower practitioners is recommended. Managers should consider structured professional support and the benefits of the employment assistance programme. Divisions could benefit from utilising existing examples of good practice in providing training and information to staff. Disappointingly, much of the work in custody to assess, treat and manage sex offenders was poor. There was shockingly little training and staff felt unsupported. Liaison between prison and probation staff was often not strong, resulting in insufficient sentence plans. There was a lack of intervention, especially since the removal of the Sex Offender Treatment Programme in custody. This has resulted in untreated men leaving prison or delay and disruption to progress on sentences. Offender Management in Custody (OMic) may address some of these issues, but differentials between areas may only highlight this further. The report finds sufficient quality in OASys and use of RM2000. The Active Risk Management System (ARMS) was used in most cases, but the quality was poor. Many practitioners were not fully recognising the benefits of the assessment and not relating it to intervention and future risk assessments. ARMS needs to be included in the overall assessment and intervention for it to be effective. Accredited programmes were not used enough and the delivery of one-to-one intervention was ‘inconsistent at best and non-existent at worst’. Review processes nationally are inconsistent and purposeful home visits lacking in community cases, resulting in missed vital information. Appropriate MAPPA levels were used but the process was not working well in custody and information exchange between partners was not always present. The value of ARMS is not yet recognised, and by incorporating good practice to training programmes it is hoped that the benefits will be promoted. Overall, some good practice was noted in all probation regions. We now need to model these to replicate in all areas with a national training programme to increase the use of a strength-based approach and empower already skilled and committed staff.

中文翻译：

---

分析 12-18 岁青少年对其在安全培训中心和 YOI 中的体验的看法

感受到关注风险的压力，并且对基于实力的方法缺乏理解。实践中存在不一致之处，原因在于国家培训的推广不力。建议进行培训和支持以增强从业者的能力。管理人员应考虑结构化的专业支持和就业援助计划的好处。各司可受益于利用现有的良好做法范例向工作人员提供培训和信息。令人失望的是，在押期间评估、治疗和管理性犯罪者的大部分工作都很糟糕。令人震惊的是，培训很少，工作人员感到不受支持。监狱和缓刑工作人员之间的联系往往不紧密，导致刑期计划不足。缺乏干预，尤其是在取消羁押中的性犯罪者治疗计划之后。这导致未经治疗的男子离开监狱或延迟和中断判决进展。羁押中的罪犯管理 (OMic) 可能会解决其中一些问题，但地区之间的差异可能只会进一步突出这一点。报告发现 OASys 质量足够，使用 RM2000。大多数情况下使用主动风险管理系统（ARMS），但质量较差。许多从业者没有充分认识到评估的好处，也没有将其与干预和未来的风险评估联系起来。ARMS 需要包含在整体评估和干预中才能有效。经认可的程序没有得到足够的使用，一对一干预的提供“最好的情况是不一致的，最坏的情况是不存在的”。在全国范围内，审查过程不一致且有目的的家访缺乏社区案例，导致错过重要信息。使用了适当的 MAPPA 级别，但该过程在托管中运行不佳，并且合作伙伴之间的信息交换并不总是存在。ARMS 的价值尚未得到认可，通过将良好实践纳入培训计划，希望能够提升其效益。总体而言，在所有试用地区都注意到了一些良好做法。我们现在需要对这些进行建模，以通过国家培训计划在所有领域进行复制，以增加对基于实力的方法的使用，并赋予已经熟练和忠诚的员工权力。使用了适当的 MAPPA 级别，但该过程在托管中运行不佳，并且合作伙伴之间的信息交换并不总是存在。ARMS 的价值尚未得到认可，通过将良好实践纳入培训计划，希望能够提升其效益。总体而言，在所有试用地区都注意到了一些良好做法。我们现在需要对这些进行建模，以通过国家培训计划在所有领域进行复制，以增加对基于实力的方法的使用，并赋予已经熟练和忠诚的员工权力。使用了适当的 MAPPA 级别，但该过程在托管中运行不佳，并且合作伙伴之间的信息交换并不总是存在。ARMS 的价值尚未得到认可，通过将良好实践纳入培训计划，希望能够提升其效益。总体而言，在所有试用地区都注意到了一些良好做法。我们现在需要对这些进行建模，以通过国家培训计划在所有领域进行复制，以增加对基于实力的方法的使用，并赋予已经熟练和忠诚的员工权力。