The current law in England and Wales adopts a no-property approach to cadavers and separated bodily parts; paradoxically, it affords proprietary protection to tissue users at the expense of tissue sources. Non-proprietary frameworks hardly offer effective legal redress to tissue sources. Potentially, the law could offer tissue sources a mix of proprietary and non-proprietary remedies. Drawing from the work of the famous anthropologist, Marilyn Strathern, I argue that such a flexible and eclectic approach might be facilitated by the concept of duplex, an analytical tool that promotes divergent thinking and paradoxical conceptions of a given issue. I argue that while the no-property rule reflects a duplex on bodily parts, the duplex is narrow and ought to be conceptualised more broadly to cover the claims of tissue sources.

中文翻译：

---

身体部位的调节：将身体部位理解为双工

英格兰和威尔士的现行法律对尸体和分离的身体部位采取无财产处理办法；矛盾的是，它以牺牲组织资源为代价为组织使用者提供了专有保护。非专有框架很难为组织来源提供有效的法律补救措施。法律可能会为组织来源提供专有和非专有补救措施的组合。借鉴著名人类学家 Marilyn Strathern 的工作，我认为这种灵活和不拘一格的方法可能会受到以下概念的促进：双工，一种分析工具，可促进对特定问题的发散思维和自相矛盾的概念。我认为，虽然无属性规则反映了身体部位的双工，但双工是狭窄的，应该更广泛地概念化以涵盖组织来源的主张。