Since Blevins (2006), there has been a shift in morphological frameworks away from what he called a constructive perspective towards an abstractive perspective based on data directly available to speakers (i.e whole words).This evolution towards word-based morphology is part of a more general anticonstructionist movement in social sciences characterised by the quote in (1) about constructive approaches cited by Blevins et al. (2016a): (1)The main fallacy in this kind of thinking is that the reductionist hypothesis does not by any means imply a “constructionist” one: The ability to reduce everything to simple fundamental laws does not imply the ability to start from those laws and reconstruct the universe. In fact the more the elementary physicists tell us about the nature of the fundamental laws, the less relevance they seem to have to the very real problems of the rest of science, much less to those of society (Anderson 1972). In this paper, we elaborate on Blevins (2006) to define a realistic perspective for the use of morphological data and give an illustration of its place in the emergence of both inflectional and derivation paradigms with the French verbs and the French Ethnics.

中文翻译：

---

现实的数据和范式：范式单元查找问题

自Blevins（2006）以来，词法框架已经从他所谓的建设性观点转变为基于直接可用于说话者（即整个单词）的数据的抽象观点。社会科学中更普遍的反建构主义运动，其特征是在（1）中引用了Blevins等人所引用的建设性方法。（2016a）：（1）这种思想的主要谬误是，还原论假设绝不意味着“建构论”：将一切简化为简单基本定律的能力并不意味着从这些定律出发规律和重建宇宙。实际上，基本物理学家向我们介绍了基本定律的性质，他们似乎与其余科学的非常现实的问题之间的联系越少，与社会之间的联系就越少（Anderson 1972）。在本文中，我们详细介绍了Blevins（2006年），为使用形态学数据定义了一个现实的观点，并举例说明了它在法语动词和法语种族的屈折和派生范式出现中的地位。