formulations’ (pp. 333, 335): the Tamil, Andhra, Odisha and Bengal coasts on the eastern seaboard of South Asia; the Thai, Malay, and Cham subregions in maritime Southeast Asia; and the Champa and Dai Viet realms along the eastern littoral of Mainland Southeast Asia. It would have been helpful to identify the Braudelian deep structures or elements of commonality of this internally diverse region (see, for instance, Sunil Amrith, Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and the Fortunes of Migrants. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013, ch. 2.). In the end, as an interdisciplinary assemblage of essays drawing on archaeology, ceramics, anthropology, literary studies, and history, Cross-cultural Networking in the Eastern Indian Ocean exhibits, in the words of the editors, ‘considerable variety apart from distinct commonalities’ (p. xv). Using a wide range of mixed media and research methodologies from archaeological recoveries to textual analysis, the resulting bricolage presents and represents an important kaleidoscopic case study of cross-cultural encounters in world history.

中文翻译：

---

书评：基德船长的失船：奎达商人的残骸

配方”（第 333、335 页）：南亚东海岸的泰米尔、安得拉、奥里萨和孟加拉海岸；东南亚海上的泰语、马来语和占族分区域；以及东南亚大陆东部沿海的占婆和大越王国。确定这个内部多样化区域的布劳德深层结构或共性元素会有所帮助（例如，参见 Sunil Amrith，穿越孟加拉湾：自然之怒和移民的财富。剑桥：哈佛大学出版社，2013 年，第 2 章）。最后，东印度洋跨文化网络作为考古学、陶瓷、人类学、文学研究和历史的跨学科论文集，用编辑的话说，“除了明显的共同点之外，还有相当多的多样性” （第十五页）。