Leader Edwin Miller Aplin’s military career, his visit to Belsen in June 1945, and his correspondence with family friend and lawyer Lillian Sandler in Toronto—each of which is highly revealing in its own right—the Habermas interjection falls a little flat. But the theoretical sections are not the book’s main contribution to the literature. Celinscak’s analysis of the work of the war artists and photographers, medics, nurses, and chaplains, and his detailed demonstration that Canadian military and related personnel played a vital role in the liberation of Belsen and its aftermath, contribute significantly to our knowledge of what happened there. If the arguments about what it all means from a more literary-theoretical perspective—e.g., concerning the ways in which soldiers “searched desperately for ways to make a frightful experience intelligible” (p. 112)—are familiar, this is because the Canadians, unsurprisingly, faced the same problem as the better-studied British witnesses: how to make sense of something that appeared to resist rational comprehension.

中文翻译：

---

犹太荣誉法庭：大屠杀后的欧洲和以色列的复仇，报应与和解

领导人埃德温·米勒·阿普林（Edwin Miller Aplin）的军事生涯，1945年6月对贝尔森的访问以及他与家人朋友和律师莉莲·桑德勒（Lillian Sandler）在多伦多的往来信件（每件事本身都具有很高的启示性），哈贝马斯的感叹词略有下降。但是理论部分并不是本书对文学的主要贡献。塞林斯卡克（Celinscak）对战争艺术家和摄影师，军医，护士和牧师的工作的分析，以及他的详细论证表明加拿大军队和相关人员在贝尔森的解放及其后果中起着至关重要的作用，这大大有助于我们对所发生的事情的了解那里。如果从文学理论的角度来论证一切意味着什么，例如，