Taking a cue from their less-than-marginal place in scholarship today, we call supernatural beings the “Unbelieved” and the explicit or implicit denial of them “Dogmatic Secularism.” We argue that objective historians should not discount, in advance, evidence that points to the existence or involvement of the Unbelieved in history; instead, we should cultivate a sceptical attitude towards all sources. In this, the second half of a two-part essay, we first highlight the work of recent scholars who have pioneered a trail beyond Dogmatic Secularism. We conclude with practical suggestions towards a more truly empirical attitude towards sources involving the Unbelieved.

中文翻译：

---

难以置信的历史学家，第二部分：建议和解决方案

从今天他们在学业中的边际地位中寻找线索，我们将超自然生物称为“不相信”，对他们的明示或暗示否认是“教义世俗主义”。我们认为，客观的历史学家不应该事先低估表明“非信徒”历史存在或介入的证据。相反，我们应该对所有消息来源持怀疑态度。在这篇由两部分组成的文章的后半部分中，我们首先着重介绍最近的学者的工作，他们开创了超越教条主义世俗主义的道路。最后，我们针对对涉及Unbeled的资源采取更真实的经验态度的实践建议。