Abstract Assessing the extent to which states have implemented the decisions of supranational human rights bodies is a challenging task. It requires supranational bodies—be they judicial, quasi-judicial or political—to create an evidence-based public record of the status quo of implementation at any point in time and determine whether the measures taken do, in fact, satisfy the requirements of the decision. This, in turn, relies upon states engaging in good faith, victims having a voice, and civil society organizations seizing the opportunity to influence the follow-up process. Using empirical data from interviews in selected states in the African, Inter-American and European regions, and within regional and United Nations bodies, this article argues that in no human rights ‘system’ are all these expectations met, in part because follow-up work is inadequately resourced. It argues that supranational bodies should proactively seek out diverse sources of information and adopt more transparent and responsive working methods so as to enable ‘real time’ participation by all interested parties. The article concludes with recommendations for supranational bodies, and state and non-state actors.

中文翻译：

---

确定和评估人权决定的执行情况

摘要 评估国家执行超国家人权机构决定的程度是一项具有挑战性的任务。它要求超国家机构——无论是司法的、准司法的还是政治的——在任何时间点创建一个基于证据的公共执行现状记录，并确定所采取的措施是否确实满足了《公约》的要求。决定。这反过来又依赖于国家的善意参与、受害者有发言权，以及民间社会组织抓住机会影响后续进程。本文使用在非洲、美洲和欧洲地区的选定国家以及地区和联合国机构内进行访谈的经验数据，认为没有任何人权“体系”能够满足所有这些期望，部分原因是后续工作资源不足。它认为，超国家机构应积极寻找各种信息来源，并采用更加透明和反应灵敏的工作方法，以便所有利益相关方都能“实时”参与。文章最后提出了对超国家机构、国家和非国家行为者的建议。